The Worst Predictors

What about the worst predictors of job performance? Studies show that measures which are irrelevant to a job are worst at predicting performance. These measures range from candidate interests, with a predictive validity of 0.10, to candidate graphology (handwriting) with a predictive validity of only 0.02. The nature of predictive validity in psychometric tests is such that predictive power increases exponentially with correlation. This means that tests able to achieve correlations of 0.5 or greater, such as a general mental ability test, are highly predictive. A predictor with a correlation of 0.5 can explain 25% of the variance between candidates. Tests with correlations as low as 0.10, on the other hand, explain less than 2% of the variance between candidates, indicating that they are very poor predictors of performance.
Want to learn more about candidate assessments? Contact Ken Kanara, our Managing Director, for a free Strategic Needs Assessment.
Ken Kanara
Managing Director

The 2022
ECA CFO Report

ECA Mid-Market Transformation Whitepaper

Value-Creation Talent Solutions for Strategy, Finance, and Operations

Get in touch to find your next hire.

Get Started with ECA

Tell us about your hiring needs using the form below. One of our Managing Directors will be in touch to help.

Download the latest CFO whitepaper, written by our finance practice lead

Download the Mid-Market Transformation Whitepaper by our private equity practice leads

Interested in joining us?

Enter your info to schedule an interview with one of our internship leads.